Caritas India
Guwahati, Assam
 |
| Prabal Sen |
Being a man from
Environmental Sciences, People Led Development (PLD) approach was a completely
new subject to me. Initially I was not convinced with the concept as my
question was that how would it benefit the farmers, something that the project
is trying to do?
We were
specifically then told that PLD being the integral component of Facilitating
Agriculture Regeneration Measures (FARM) project has to be taken up on a
priority basis. I obliged but still with a little confused state of mind as to
how to give it a start?
I went through a
few stories on PLD shared by West Zone. The first read, well I could not
connect to the North Eastern context. I went through the stories a couple of
times more & was trying to figure out how best these stories could help me
in understanding PLD.
All that I could
understand about PLD was that it’s about community and not individual. The
second best thing that drew my interest is PLD talks about revival of traditional
knowledge, a domain that I have been working in the past. I wondered that PLD
is already omnipresent in my region yet could not be identified. I thought there
could be innumerable examples of communities across rural North East (NE) India,
where the spirit of oneness is still visible in so many aspects of life and society.
Different tribes, different groups are the custodians of a rich culture &
heritage that they have inherited from their ancestors. My simple understanding
was that elements of PLD are just there & all that is required is identify
them.
I made up my mind
to go the partners’ field and the see how PLD can be put into action. I did not
make any plan or strategy to discuss PLD with different partners. May be I
realised that it had to come of its own as per the situation on the ground.
Being in the field,
the simplest of common examples (on PLD) I cited to the partners was that of
the community coming together to help someone who lost his house in a fire
incident. Prompt came the response from them, “Yes we know about this practice and it’s still in practice”! This
reply was perhaps the starting point for understanding for them. I carried on
from here and tried my best to explain to the project teams on how PLD works.
However, I made it very clear to them that any farmer or community has got
nothing to do with PLD and that its exclusively for us to understand &
apply.
I put array of
questions to them & tried to find out PLD cases with special reference to
the project. They understood and responded with a number of such cases that had
elements of PLD within the project as well as outside. All this came up on the
first day of visit during meetings with the respective project team. Come
second day and we were off to the field, in the specific areas where PLD cases
were reported by the project teams. I took the initiative in interacting with
the community & showed to the team in details on how to go about. I helped
them to identify more of such cases throughout my visit. It was then for the team
to take the lead in interacting with the community.
The project teams
carried over from here & the ray of confidence was clearly visible on their
faces. My hard work seemed to have paid back when I heard the project team
saying that now they have a clear understanding on PLD & now they take it
forward. Results are showing now as I have received quite a few PLD case
studies from the different project teams & these stories have been
published on the blog.
Being again from a
different educational background, I do not have indepth knowledge of RBM but I respect
the subject & try to learn as much I can. Likewise PLD, as already stated
above, would not have drawn my attention had it not included components like
what I was looking for.
PLD has changed in
a way changed my thinking as a technical person, who was busy sharing
technologies to the farmers & gave me an opportunity to think out of the box. I have learned that as per the concept of PLD prescription would not work but options do.
Finally, it’s been
a great journey of two years with PLD and above all, learning has been my
biggest of gains.
As they if you
enjoy your work you love it and so am I....
Prabal Sen
State Officer, North East
Guwahati, Assam
 |
| Thangsha Sebastian Anchong |
I have learnt that the age old traditional practices among
the communities in North East help them to a great extent to find a solution to
their issues. I also experienced that of late the same community are somehow
losing their rich traditional practices. Therefore, I see a kind of disconnect
that the community of present day is faced with. However, whatever little the
community has been able to practice till date in different sectors, sets a
great example to show that the community never acts individually but as a unit.
In this context I would say that People Led Development (PLD) approach is all about creating
empowerment of the community by building their capacities and supporting their
initiatives with the aim of giving them greater control over their own
development initiatives. It helps them
to reflect and think to identify their needs, issues and concerns to generate
community solution. PLD approach would also lead to strengthen the age old
traditional practices that hold a high risk of getting extinct. PLD in FARM
North East is perhaps a good step towards moving out from the traditional mode
of project that we implement.
Thangsha Sebastian Anchong
State Officer, North East
Guwahati, Assam
 |
| Albinus Kujur |
Peoples’ initiative is
observed in day to day life in Adivasi community and also in most of the tribes of
North East India. But People Led
Development (PLD) approach in FARM
Northeast project talks about the developmental aspect of the community through
their own initiatives; and which is looked to be more sustainable. This developmental aspect is about peoples’
initiatives within the community and also relates to development through
government through the peoples own initiatives by means of linkage building,
enhancing capacities and explore their own potentials.
Having been exposed to
the concept of PLD, I can’t wait to share a unique peoples’ initiative called Hawri,
practiced by my community. Hawri is a traditional system prevalent among the
Adivasis that promotes the spirit of working together to help each other. People
get organized themselves to help their own people. The family that seeks the
help from the members of the community would provide food and refreshment to
all. This is one of the traditional practices that have been practiced from ancestors. HAWRI can be seen in many aspects of the
society like agricultural activities; construction of houses, collecting
firewood, marriages & also during many other activities & rituals.
PLD as such is visible
in most of the ethnic communities across the NE region. I am happy to learn
that through PLD a trial is being made to into picture the rich treasure of traditional
knowledge & ethics of the ethnic communities of North East India.
Finance Officer, North East
Guwahati, Assam
 |
| Saju M.K. |
My
first meeting with the eleven organisations working on People Led Development
(PLD) in North East India was the quarterly review in July 2014. One of the
things that I did during the review meeting was sharing with participants my
opinion on PLD. In spite of my best efforts to convey my convictions and the
experiences on PLD, I knew the coordinators
understood very little of what I spoke. Even more, they looked puzzled. I had expected
it since it was natural. For a cadre of workers which was accustomed to Results
Based Management (RBM) and the necessity to deliver results more as ‘drivers’
rather than ‘facilitators’, introduction of PLD halfway into the project had to
be confusing.
While
the review was still rolling on, I was searching for a PLD narrative that is simpler,
clearer and more convincing. I must have missed a couple of presentations
because I was lost in my world of PLD. Coordinators, without exception,
followed the RBM format for presentation not just because they were asked to do
that but it was easier as well. Finally when I started paying attention to the
presentations, I discovered there is an intriguing pattern in the presentations.
To my pleasant surprise, some of them also added a few slides in which they had
presented the results which they could not fit into the RBM presentation
format! None of these results were planned or written in the proposal and most
of these results were achieved by communities on their own! Equally striking
was the enthusiasm of coordinators to showcase those creditable achievements
which were relevant to the real life contexts of communities.
The
PLD discussion resumed from there and it was more contextual, meaningful and
enjoyable.
I
will leave RBM to its exponents to defend it. In a context where agencies seek
to ‘work with’ communities in true sense, RBM helps neither the communities nor
the agencies. Or at best, it helps only a little. There are several
perspectives on the possible interactivity of RBM and PLD. However, I would
pick up the practice of result presentation in the context of RBM and PLD, as expressed
in the review experience referenced above.
In
an RBM scenario, the mission of a field worker is rather simple because s/he
normally does not think or act beyond what is written in the project document. S/he
just does not need to. If we inquire anytime during the project period about
what they do they will invariably give answers that are consistent with what is
written in the proposal. They will
always prefer to do, or at least prioritise to do, the activities that are
written in the proposal and not always the activities that the communities
would expect them to do. This applies to the representation of results as well.
We, more often than not, tend to report the results in a framework that is
manufactured away from the community. And, in those very few occasions when
coordinators deviate a little to include the vital and meaningful gains of
communities, they are ‘disciplined’ to follow the format of presentation.
It
was, hence, very satisfying for me to observe that some enterprising coordinators
resisted the tendency to ‘conform’ and gathered enough courage and motivation
to ‘improvise’ their formats for capturing the results that communities had
achieved with a little assistance from the field workers. The happiness of
coordinators when they said “we have some more results to present” was so
pronounced.
As
a person who has seen both RBM and PLD sides, I have become increasingly
doubtful of the ability of RBM to satisfactorily capture the successes of
communities in responding to their evolving and continuously changing needs. In
a normal rural scenario, how many issues remain in constant degree of severity,
in constant extent and in constant length of time? I wish RBM will suit those
few. But there are far more pressing and urgent needs of the community which an
organisation needs to respond to as a companion of people in need. The
coordinators who had presented additional slides of successes in their
presentation were trying to do just that!
PLD is all about responding to the everyday
needs of the community without the precondition of having a proposal. It is all
about responding in a more meaningful way – encouraging and enabling communities
to lead themselves.
Saju M.K.
Zonal Manager, West Zone
Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh